James Anaya

Ua

 

 

Statement of Special Rapporteur upon conclusion of visit to New Zealand, 2010 Print
23 July 2010

PDF Version [En]

Statement of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the situation of the human rights
and fundamental freedoms of indigenous peoples,

Professor James Anaya,
upon conclusion of his visit to New Zealand

23 July 2010

During the course of the past five days in New Zealand, I met with Government authorities, representatives of Maori communities and organizations, and others, in places in and around Auckland, Wellington, Waitangi, Hamilton, and Whanganui. I visited a number of Maori communities in both rural and urban areas, and collected information from various sources. I would like to express my appreciation for the support of the Government, in particular the Ministry of Maori Affairs, and the Maori individuals and organizations that provided indispensible support in planning and coordinating the visit. I would especially like to thank those Maori peoples that invited me into their marae and communities, and shared with me aspects of their unique and vibrant culture.

At the invitation of the Government, and with the encouragement of Maori leaders, I came to New Zealand to follow up on the work of my predecessor, Rodolfo Stavenhagen, the previous Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of indigenous people, who visited the country in 2005.

I have observed several positive aspects of New Zealand's legal and policy landscape, as well as ongoing challenges, in relation to Maori issues. A unique feature of New Zealand is the Treaty of Waitangi of 1840, which is understood to be one of the country's founding instruments. The principles of the Treaty provide a foundation for Maori self-determination based on a real partnership between Maori and the New Zealand State, within a framework of respect for cross cultural understanding and the human rights of all citizens. I have learned of steps being taken within this framework, which can be described as constituting a good practice in the making, and I hope that concerted efforts will continue to be made in this regard.

It should be noted that certain initiatives underway in New Zealand represent important steps towards advancing the purpose and objectives of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. This Declaration, far from affirming rights that place indigenous peoples in a privileged position, aims at repairing the ongoing consequences of the historical denial of the right to self-determination and other basic human rights. I am, of course, very pleased to note that New Zealand recently declared its endorsement of the Declaration, thus joining the overwhelming majority of States that have expressed their support for this historic instrument.

During my visit, I have been especially interested in examining the process for settling historical and contemporary claims based on the Treaty of Waitangi, a matter that was addressed in detail in the report of my predecessor. I note that the treaty settlement process is clearly one of the most important examples in the world of an effort to address historical and ongoing grievances of indigenous peoples, and that settlements already achieved have provided significant benefits in several cases. The Waitangi Tribunal, which is connected to the treaty settlement process, itself provides an important venue for examining Maori claims. I note the Government's commitment to the ongoing functioning of the Waitangi Tribunal and steps it has taken to improve and accelerate the treaty settlement process, and I encourage further efforts towards this end.

However, during my visit I have heard complaints about the treaty settlement process that are similar to those reported by my predecessor. These include complaints about the inherent lack of bargaining power on the part of Maori in the settlement negotiations, the resulting lack of settlement outcomes that provide full and adequate redress to Maori grievances, and policies that restrict the transference of lands back into Maori ownership or control.

These complaints were highlighted to me by accounts of the recent refusal of the Government to allow for the possibility of the return of lands within the Urewera National Park to the Tuhoe Iwi. I respectfully urge the Government to reconsider this decision in light of the merits of the Tuhoe claim and considerations of restorative justice, and to not foreclose return of these lands to the Tuhoe in the future even if it is not included in a near-term settlement.

Another matter raised by my predecessor was the Foreshore and Seabed Act of 2004. I would like to take note of the Government's efforts to repeal and reform this act, which I see as a positive development since my predecessor's visit. While I recognize that this process is still underway, I would like to urge the Government to ensure that the reform process includes an adequate dialogue with Maori people, and that the new legislative arrangement avoids any discriminatory effects and establishes measures to recognize and protect rights of iwi over the foreshore and seabed.

I would like to emphasize that all these concerns lend support to the assertion I repeatedly heard over the last several days that the principles enshrined in the Treaty of Waitangi and related internationally-protected human rights must be provided with constitutional security. From what I have observed, the Treaty's principles appear to be vulnerable to political discretion, resulting in their perpetual insecurity and instability. I understand that the Government has committed to undergo a process of review of constitutional arrangements as they relate to Maori people and I encourage the Government to carry out these efforts with the full and adequate participation of the Maori.

Finally, I cannot help but note the extreme disadvantage in the social and economic conditions of Maori people, which are dramatically manifested in the continued and persistent high levels of incarceration of Maori individuals. These troubling conditions undoubtedly result from the historical and ongoing denial of the human rights of Maori, which must continue to be addressed as a matter of upmost priority. In this regard, I am pleased to learn about a number of Government programs to address this disadvantage, including the Whanau Ora program, an initiative currently being developed by the Government, to be carried out in partnership with Maori people to address socioeconomic concerns, especially through the strengthening of Maori families.

I will continue to examine these and other issues that have been brought to my attention in further detail, and will be issuing a full report providing observations and recommendations addressing these concerns. I look forward to ongoing engagement and cooperation with the Government of New Zealand and Maori representatives with a view towards advancing the human rights of Maori people in Aotearoa.

Tags: New Zealand
 

UNSR Website

For information about and communication with the current Special Rapportuer visit
unsr.vtaulicorpuz.org

UNPFII 2014


You are here  : Home Documents Country Reports Statement of Special Rapporteur upon conclusion of visit to New Zealand, 2010